Death Penalty Arguments Against Essay Death Penalty Argumentative Essay. The Death Penalty should not be allowed in any country because of its bad influence. The death penalty has the risk of executing an innocent person. Everyone in death row has the right to a second chance to life. Sometime there is no evidence for Arguments Against The Death Penalty Words | 4 Pages excessive use of the death penalty by saying it brings families closure or that it deters murder-these have proven incorrect. The death penalty violates the eighth amendment due to the fact that it does not always work An Argument Against the Death Penalty This persuasive essay makes the case that, while arguments in favor of the death penalty exist, it does not belong in this century and should be replaced with a more effective punishment. PAGES 1. WORDS View Full Essay
Argumentative Essay on Death Penalty - blogger.com
The death penalty is the ultimate punishment, anti death penalty arguments essay. There is no harsher punishment than death itself. Currently fifty-eight nations practice the death penalty. Our nation, the United States of America, is one of the fifty-eight nations that practice the death penalty. Currently the United States will only use the death penalty, if one commits first-degree murder, anti death penalty arguments essay.
Individuals that believe in the death penalty believe that capital punishment will deter murderers. In this paper, I will be arguing that the death penalty does not deter criminals and that the United States should outlaw the practice. Before I make my argument, I would like to provide some background information regarding the death penalty to the readers. The idea of capital punishment was brought over from Britain, when the founding fathers declared independence.
Our ancestors loved the idea of the death penalty, since it was a common part of life. Europeans gave the death penalty for various crimes. The first recorded execution in America occurred in Jamestown, A man named George Kendall was executed for treason. In the earlier colonial days, laws regarding capital punishment varied area to area. During the nineteen century, the death penalty changed dramatically.
Around this time the death penalty started to lose popularity. States no longer committed public executions. All executions were done in private, anti death penalty arguments essay. Pennsylvania was the first state to adopt this trend. Eventually some states abolished the death penalty all together. In current times, anti death penalty arguments essay, fourteen out of fifty states no longer carry out the death penalty.
These states are Alaska, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Rhone Island, anti death penalty arguments essay, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.
In addition, a series of cases regarding the death penalty went to the Supreme Court. Many tried to argue that the death penalty violated the eighth amendments and that capital punishment is cruel and unusual.
InFurman v. Georgia successfully brought an temporary end to the death penalty for ten years. Eventually the death penalty was reinstated with the execution of Gary Gillmore on January 17, As of today, the United States still practices capital punishment. Anti death penalty arguments essay there are limitations.
For example, the government cannot execute the mentally handicap and is not supposed to execute juveniles. The United States currently anti death penalty arguments essay six ways to execute, lethal injection, electrocution, lethal gas, a firing squad and hanging.
Methods will vary state by state. Although the United States still practices the death penalty, executions are declining, compare to the past, according to statistics. Those that are for the death penalty claims that the death penalty will serve as a deterrence and is the only way for retribution against anti death penalty arguments essay. Both issues are highly debatable and have been a subject of criticism.
Punishment as a deterrence has been a goal for ages. This concept does work, but it should not be applied to all criminals, in my opinion. Pro capital punishment individuals claims that it is an efficient deterrence against criminals.
We believe that this has occurred in part because of the strong signal that the death penalty sent to violent criminals and murderer. There is a huge amount of conflicting evidence from similar studies done currently and in the past. Retribution has also been a goal for punishment. Logically if a killer is put to death then there would be no more killings.
American society seems to favor retribution. An eye for an eye has been a law for ages. Unless that balance is restored, society succumbs to a rule of violence. For example, if the country is punishing one for killing, what gives the country the right to kill? Jeffrey Fagan of Columbia University describes numerous serious errors in recent deterrence studies, including improper statistical analyses and missing data and variables that are necessary to give a full picture of the criminal justice system.
These flaws and omissions in a body of scientific evidence render it unreliable as a basis for law or policy that generate life-and-death decisions. Those who claim that the death penalty is an efficient deterrence fail to submit conclusive evidence, therefore as a critic, we should dismiss the claim that the death penalty works as deterrence. In addition, many studies seem to disprove the theory that the death penalty is a good deterrence against violent crimes and murders.
According to the Death Penalty Information Center, states without the death penalty have had lower murder rates. In fact, in the first year that New York abolished the death penalty they saw a four percent decrease in their murder rates. The reason why the death penalty does not serve as deterrence is that offenders do not believe they will be caught.
Deterrence is a psychological process. Therefore, if an offender does not believe that a real risk is present, there will be no deterrence. The death penalty as retribution no longer makes sense in our current society. By executing an offender, our government, is sending subliminal messages regarding murder. The point of capital punishment is because the United States government wants to express that anti death penalty arguments essay is an intolerable crime.
By killing, an offender the government is contradicting itself. In addition, the death penalty can be seen as revenge. We are simply taking an eye for an eye. Two wrongs will not make a right. Killing a murderer will not bring back the murdered. In the 21th century our criminals laws should now reflect a higher standard that an eye for an eye. In current times, the death penalty can no longer be claimed as an efficient form of retribution.
There are anti death penalty arguments essay delays in carrying out the executions of an inmate. Statistics show that there is over an eight-year wait before an execution can take place.
In fact, most death row inmates die of old age, anti death penalty arguments essay, before their execution sentence. Sinceonly thirteen inmates have been executed. If the trend continues, that would mean most of the inmates would die of natural causes before their execution sentence can be carried out. Those that claim the death penalty as retribution fail to take notice of the execution process in our criminal justice system.
Anti death penalty arguments essay is needed in the American criminal justice system because the process is designed to protect against human errors.
An average appeal can take over ten years. There are simply not enough judges to response to all case reviews. For example, the United States Supreme court receives thousands of case reviews annually, but because there are only nine judges in the Supreme Court, only a handful of cases are reviewed.
For these reasons, the death penalty cannot be claim as an efficient form of retribution. Since the death penalty is no longer an affected punishment, I purposed that anti death penalty arguments essay abolish the practice in the United States.
Many were successful in temporary abolishing the death penalty, but most states reinstated the death penalty after judicial review. The most current issue regarding the abolishment of the death penalty was Baze v.
Baze V. Rees, was an attack on the process of execution, specifically lethal injections. Baze argues that lethal injections is a form of cruel and unusual punishment and went against the constitution. That debate ultimately failed, since the judges ruled in favor of the death penalty. Rees was a good attempt in trying to abolish the death penalty, but ultimately was unsuccessful because they were attacking the process not the problem. In addition, Baze fail to show any solid evidence that lethal injections may cause pain.
In order to abolish the death penalty in the United States successfully, anti death penalty arguments essay, one would need to make a case to the United States Supreme Court.
One would need to submit a writ of either certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition. Anti death penalty arguments essay addition, one can appeal against the death penalty. If the case were selected, then one would need to argue that the death penalty is no longer a form of justice. The key to winning this case, in my opinion, is to present solid and conclusive evidence. Show the nine justices, that the death penalty is a waste of resources and unconstitutional.
Some may criticize that by abolishing the death penalty, crime rates will increase. Studies have already shown that the death penalty will not deter criminals. Currently there is no solid evidence that proves that the death penalty will deter criminals; however, there is evidence showing that states with no death penalty has a lower murder rate than states with the death penalty.
Conclusive evidence such as the fact should dispel any criticism regarding the death penalty and murder rates. The death penalty should be abolish. Those that believe in the death penalty, failed to make their anti death penalty arguments essay. There is no conclusive evidence that supports their claims.
There is evidence however that the death penalty is failing.
The Death Penalty Debate
, time: 8:06Argument against Death Penalty Essay Sample, Words, 1 Pages ��| Studyfy
Sep 17, · Another important argument supported by abolitionists is that the death penalty discriminates against minorities and the poor, as it is people from these groups that are more likely to be sentenced to blogger.comted Reading Time: 9 mins Feb 10, · Arguments Against The Death Penalty Essay Capital punishment is a punishment that results in death usually caused by capital crimes or capital offenses. It is commonly referred to as the death sentence. According to an article “Buzzle” not all countries accept capital punishment but there are still a lot of states who do (par.1) Death Penalty Arguments Against Essay Death Penalty Argumentative Essay. The Death Penalty should not be allowed in any country because of its bad influence. The death penalty has the risk of executing an innocent person. Everyone in death row has the right to a second chance to life. Sometime there is no evidence for
No comments:
Post a Comment